ELECTIONS…
Kentucky … It’s fake right.. can’t happen… liars… maybe, maybe not
Expert Testifies in Court: Dominion Voting Systems Easily Hackable
A voter casts a ballot for tabulation. (Michael Owen Baker/AFP via Getty Images)
By Charlie McCarthy | Tuesday, 23 January 2024 10:18 AM EST
A voting systems expert testifying in a Georgia trial last week demonstrated that Dominion Voting Systems machines were so easily hackable he could use a Bic pen and smart card to copy, edit, and change votes in seconds, according to Law360 Pulse, which is covering the trial.
Professor J. Alex Halderman of the University of Michigan, the author of a highly publicized report detailing deficiencies in Dominion’s voting machines, testified at an Atlanta trial Thursday in a case filed in 2017 against the state of Georgia.
The suit was originally filed by the Coalition for Good Governance, a liberal activist group, which claimed the state’s use of voting machines which include touch-screen computers to cast ballots without the benefit of a verifiable print ballot, made the voting counts susceptible to manipulation.
After the suit, Georgia election officials changed their voting vendor in 2020 to Dominion Voting Systems, which also used a touch-screen ballot but provided voters with a paper ballot containing a QR code containing their vote information.
The Good Governance suit, however, asked a federal judge to order Georgia to stop using Dominion since they claimed their machines remain vulnerable to attack.
The suit also claimed the Dominion machines offer voters a paper QR code that cannot easily be read to verify the accuracy of their vote.
Halderman, who wrote a 96-page report in July 2021, began his demonstration before U.S. District Court Judge Amy Totenberg in Atlanta by asking a plaintiffs’ attorney to borrow a pen, Law360 Pulse reported.
The professor then inserted the pen into the Dominion voting machine and held it there for a few seconds, which caused the machine to reboot into “safe mode,” according to Halderman.
Halderman then explained that a person could copy or change files on the voting machine, change its operating settings, or install malware.
Halderman said accessing the “terminal emulator” could allow a user to bypass the computer’s normal security settings and obtain “super-user” access — something that allows a person to read, monitor, and change “anything,” including ballots, on the voting machine with “no limits,” Law360 Pulse reported.
“All it takes is five seconds and a Bic pen,” Halderman said.
Halderman also inserted a “$10” smart card into the machine. He said such smart cards can be programmed to replicate cards used by poll workers, voters, and technicians to access the voting machines.
The poll worker and voter cards can be used county-wide to “print as many ballots as you would like,” Halderman said.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys played a video, taken outside the courtroom, showing Halderman using a USB flash drive to alter votes in a way undetectable to voters.
The trial, which began Jan. 9, was over a case filed in 2017 by several voters and the Coalition for Good Governance against members of the State Election Board and then Georgia Republican Secretary of State Brian Kemp.
Judge Totenberg, from the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Georgia and a sister to NPR’s Nina Totenberg, is expected to issue a ruling in late spring or early summer. Totenberg was appointed by then-President Barack Obama.
The plaintiffs say they are not disputing any election results in Georgia, and their case is unrelated to the 2020 election and the defamation lawsuits brought by Dominion, CBS News reported.
Newsweek magazine
The Michigan Department of State is warning a programming issue with some machines made by Dominion Voting Systems will make casting a ballot “more inconvenient” for some voters.
Voters with disabilities and others in the battleground state can use Dominion Voter Assist Terminals (VATs) to help them mark their ballots.
People using the machines will have to carefully follow instructions to verify their ballot selections or they will receive an error message, the department said in a press release.
The error message comes up if a voter selects the “straight party” option at the start of the process but then casts their vote for candidates of different parties later on.
“Although the issue will not stop people from voting or making their preferred selections, and it will not change anyone’s votes, it will make the process more inconvenient for some voters using the VATs,” the department said.
The issue only affects voters in Michigan counties that use equipment from Dominion Voting Systems, the release said. Each early voting site and polling place in those counties has at least one VAT. A list of the voting equipment by county can be viewed on the department’s website here.
Newsweek has contacted the Michigan Department of State and Dominion for further comment via email….
…
Local New Wins
“Benson stresses that this is a nationwide issue and is not only affecting Michigan.
“Yeah, this is a nationwide issue with Dominion voter access terminals in, in the counties that use them in the voter access terminals,” says Benson. “Of course, not all the machines, just the ones that are accessible, have an issue. With the straight-party voting and a programming issue, that’s again affected the machines nationwide.””
Here the election official is getting an award not to long ago
In 2024 it’s just CRAZY TALK and an undemocratic dangerous unhinged attack on DEMOCRACY to dare still CLAIM the Election was Stolen. But in 2016-2019 it was A-OK to say it.
What’s up with that?!
DOD DIRECTIVE 5240.01
DOD INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENCE-RELATED ACTIVITIES
AND DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE COMPONENT ASSISTANCE TO
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AND OTHER CIVIL
AUTHORITIES
https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/documents/dd/issuances/dodd/524001p.pdf
SOME Historical Context…
Bush & Chenney pissed on the constitution “legalizing” all the above unconstitutional crap. Obama used the unconstitutional “kill list” via drone strikes on U.S. citizens in foreign countries that he decided were “terrorist” (Also killing any children near by).
https://www.ohiosos.gov/media-center/press-releases/2024/2024-08-21
8/21/2024
SECRETARY LAROSE REFERS EVIDENCE OF NON-CITIZEN VOTER REGISTRATIONS TO OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR POTENTIAL PROSECUTION
(Columbus) – Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose announced today that he has formally referred evidence of non-citizen voter registrations to Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost for further review and potential prosecution.
“I’m duty-bound to make sure people who haven’t yet earned citizenship in this country do not vote in our elections,” said Secretary LaRose. “We’ve so far identified 597 individuals who’ve registered to vote in Ohio despite not being citizens of the United States, as our state constitution requires. The evidence includes 138 individuals who appear to have cast a ballot in an Ohio election during the time state and federal records show they lacked citizenship status. The law requires me to refer these individuals to the attorney general, and that’s what we’re doing today.”
Earlier this year, Secretary LaRose launched a comprehensive audit of Ohio’s voter registration database, resulting in the removal of 154,995 registrations confirmed to be abandoned and inactive for at least four consecutive years…
……..
AL Secretary of State discovers thousands of non-citizens registered to vote
by Andrea RameyWed, August 14th 2024 at 5:28 PM
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WPMI) — Secretary of State Wes Allen says 3,251 people who are here legally in the country but not U.S. citizens have somehow been able to register to vote in Alabama, which is against the law.
“We’re still trying to dig in on that and get to the bottom of that,” said Allen.
He’s requested the Boards of Registrars in all 67 counties immediately inactivate those people from their voter files and start the process of removing them. In Mobile County, there are 394, and in Baldwin County, there are 143 non-citizens registered to vote. Allen says they were all issued non-citizen identification numbers by the federal government.
“If they can prove that they are naturalized citizens, they have to show an Alabama driver’s license, a valid Alabama driver’s license, or the last four digits of their Social Security number,” said Allen.
Allen says finding this out wasn’t easy. Non-citizen identification numbers are issued by the Department of Homeland Security, but he says the feds wouldn’t supply the information.
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
UNCONSTITUTIONAL CENSORSHIP…
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
FEMA, HURRICANES…
Help & Donate to non-profits & Churches But Don’t Donate to FEMA?
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
VACCINES, VIRUSES, BIG PHRAMA…
Navy Medical Officer reveals Covid Vx related HEART ISSUES
Bombshell—Japanese Study Reveals Myocarditis 20x+ to 50x+ Greater Association After mRNA Vaccination–Consider Withdrawing from Market?
MAJORIE TAYLOR GREEN!!! look how terrible & crazy she is!!
____________________________________________________________
IMMIGRATION…
“No matter your politics, these new numbers are shocking.
Of the 7 million migrants that ICE released while their cases are being processed,
663,000 have criminal histories,
13,000 were convicted of homicide,
16,000 of sexual assault, and
1,845 face homicide charges.”
independent Reporter Michael Shellenberger
……..
………
I’m not saying that ANYBODY, especially Trump, needs to talk about Haitian brothers & critters. Especially Since there’s no hard evidence that they were doing in “In Springfield”. But the reality in general is that…
The Police kill FAR more animals than any immigrants.
_______________________________________________________
ABORTION…
Since when does a human being have 2 brains, two heartbeats, 4 legs, 4 arms?
2 distinctly different sets of DNA?
maybe even a set of opposite genitals? (I know that last one has become confusing for some but still)
BTW at 9 weeks a female “fetus” has it’s own set of new eggs.
bottom line, from conception there are 2 people.
I’m not sure how some folks somehow forget that’s the main biological function of sexual activity is to create NEW people.
A NEW person, a different person is growing inside of a every pregnant woman.
That’s always perfectly clear if the child is a “wanted” child.
And miscarriage is CLEARLY understood to be a tragic event. A DEATH of a child.
But somehow if the child is unexpected and/or unwanted then all kinds of mental, moral and legal gymnastics occur to justify killing the child.
…not opinion…
but factually, scientifically, speaking, there’s really NOT a question.
the only question is, Is it MORALLY RIGHT to KILL another Human Being because…
they are handicapped?
they are young?
they don’t look human?
they are a burden?
they are old?
they are expensive?
they are a physical inconvenience for a few months?
they are female?
men don’t have to carry them?
those pro-lifers really don’t care?
they are unwanted?
For the record:
SOME of the medical “opinion” from text books and the like.
“Development of the embryo begins at Stage 1 when a sperm fertilizes an oocyte and together they form a zygote.”
[England, Marjorie A. Life Before Birth. 2nd ed. England: Mosby-Wolfe, 1996, p.31]
“Human development begins after the union of male and female gametes or germ cells during a process known as fertilization(conception).
“Fertilization is a sequence of events that begins with the contact of a sperm (spermatozoon) with a secondary oocyte (ovum) and ends with the fusion of their pronuclei (the haploid nuclei of the sperm and ovum) and the mingling of their chromosomes to form a new cell. This fertilized ovum, known as a zygote, is a large diploid cell that is the beginning, or primordium, of a human being.”
[Moore, Keith L. Essentials of Human Embryology. Toronto: B.C. Decker Inc, 1988, p.2]
“Embryo: the developing organism from the time of fertilization until significant differentiation has occurred, when the organism becomes known as a fetus.”
[Cloning Human Beings. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Rockville, MD: GPO, 1997, Appendix-2.]
“Embryo: An organism in the earliest stage of development; in a man, from the time of conception to the end of the second month in the uterus.”
[Dox, Ida G. et al. The Harper Collins Illustrated Medical Dictionary. New York: Harper Perennial, 1993, p. 146]
“Embryo: The early developing fertilized egg that is growing into another individual of the species. In man the term ’embryo’ is usually restricted to the period of development from fertilization until the end of the eighth week of pregnancy.”
[Walters, William and Singer, Peter (eds.). Test-Tube Babies. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1982, p. 160]
“The development of a human being begins with fertilization, a process by which two highly specialized cells, the spermatozoon from the male and the oocyte from the female, unite to give rise to a new organism, the zygote.”
[Langman, Jan. Medical Embryology. 3rd edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1975, p. 3]
“Embryo: The developing individual between the union of the germ cells and the completion of the organs which characterize its body when it becomes a separate organism…. At the moment the sperm cell of the human male meets the ovum of the female and the union results in a fertilized ovum (zygote), a new life has begun…. The term embryo covers the several stages of early development from conception to the ninth or tenth week of life.”
[Considine, Douglas (ed.). Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia. 5th edition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1976, p. 943]
“I would say that among most scientists, the word ’embryo’ includes the time from after fertilization…”
[Dr. John Eppig, Senior Staff Scientist, Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine) and Member of the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel — Panel Transcript, February 2, 1994, p. 31]
“The development of a human begins with fertilization, a process by which the spermatozoon from the male and the oocyte from the female unite to give rise to a new organism, the zygote.”
[Sadler, T.W. Langman’s Medical Embryology. 7th edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1995, p. 3]
“The question came up of what is an embryo, when does an embryo exist, when does it occur. I think, as you know, that in development, life is a continuum…. But I think one of the useful definitions that has come out, especially from Germany, has been the stage at which these two nuclei [from sperm and egg] come together and the membranes between the two break down.”
[Jonathan Van Blerkom of University of Colorado, expert witness on human embryology before the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel — Panel Transcript, February 2, 1994, p. 63]
“Zygote. This cell, formed by the union of an ovum and a sperm (Gr. zyg tos, yoked together), represents the beginning of a human being. The common expression ‘fertilized ovum’ refers to the zygote.”
[Moore, Keith L. and Persaud, T.V.N. Before We Are Born: Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects. 4th edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1993, p. 1]
“The chromosomes of the oocyte and sperm are…respectively enclosed within female and malepronuclei. These pronuclei fuse with each other to produce the single, diploid, 2N nucleus of the fertilized zygote. This moment of zygote formation may be taken as the beginning or zero time point of embryonic development.”
[Larsen, William J. Human Embryology. 2nd edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997, p. 17]
“Although life is a continuous process, fertilization is a critical landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new, genetically distinct human organism is thereby formed…. The combination of 23 chromosomes present in each pronucleus results in 46 chromosomes in the zygote. Thus the diploid number is restored and the embryonic genome is formed. The embryo now exists as a genetic unity.”
[O’Rahilly, Ronan and M�ller, Fabiola. Human Embryology & Teratology. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1996, pp. 8, 29. This textbook lists “pre-embryo” among “discarded and replaced terms” in modern embryology, describing it as “ill-defined and inaccurate” (p. 12}]
“Almost all higher animals start their lives from a single cell, the fertilized ovum (zygote)… The time of fertilization represents the starting point in the life history, or ontogeny, of the individual.”
[Carlson, Bruce M. Patten’s Foundations of Embryology. 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996, p. 3]
“[A]nimal biologists use the term embryo to describe the single cell stage, the two-cell stage, and all subsequent stages up until a time when recognizable humanlike limbs and facial features begin to appear between six to eight weeks after fertilization….
“[A] number of specialists working in the field of human reproduction have suggested that we stop using the word embryo to describe the developing entity that exists for the first two weeks after fertilization. In its place, they proposed the term pre-embryo….
“I’ll let you in on a secret. The term pre-embryo has been embraced wholeheartedly by IVF practitioners for reasons that are political, not scientific. The new term is used to provide the illusion that there is something profoundly different between what we nonmedical biologists still call a six-day-old embryo and what we and everyone else call a sixteen-day-old embryo.
“The term pre-embryo is useful in the political arena — where decisions are made about whether to allow early embryo (now called pre-embryo) experimentation — as well as in the confines of a doctor’s office, where it can be used to allay moral concerns that might be expressed by IVF patients. ‘Don’t worry,’ a doctor might say, ‘it’s only pre-embryos that we’re manipulating or freezing. They won’t turn into real human embryos until after we’ve put them back into your body.’”
[Silver, Lee M. Remaking Eden: Cloning and Beyond in a Brave New World. New York: Avon Books, 1997, p. 39]
“The life cycle of mammals begins when a sperm enters an egg.”Okada et al., A role for the elongator complex in zygotic paternal genome demethylation, NATURE 463:554 (Jan. 28, 2010)
“Fertilization – the fusion of gametes to produce a new organism – is the culmination of a multitude of intricately regulated cellular processes.”Marcello et al., Fertilization, ADV. EXP. BIOL. 757:321 (2013
“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.
………………………………….
“The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”“Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization:
“It should always be remembered that many organs are still not completely developed by full-term and birth should be regarded only as an incident in the whole developmental process.”F Beck Human Embryology, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1985 page vi
“Although it is customary to divide human development into prenatal and postnatal periods, it is important to realize that birth is merely a dramatic event during development resulting in a change in environment.”The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology fifth edition, Moore and Persaud, 1993, Saunders Company, page 1
……………………………….
…not opinion…
but factually, scientifically, speaking, there’s really NOT a question.
the only question is, Is it MORALLY RIGHT to KILL another Human Being because…
they are handicapped?
they are young?
they don’t look human?
they are a burden?
they are old?
they are expensive?
they are a physical inconvenience for a few months?
they are female?
men don’t have to carry them?
those prolifers really don’t care?
they are unwanted?
______________________________________________________
JANUARY 6
Exclusive: FBI finds scant evidence U.S. Capitol attack was coordinated – sources
REUTERS – By Mark Hosenball and Sarah N. Lynch
August 20, 2021 10:43 PM EDTUpdated 3 years ago
WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) – The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack, opens new tab on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.
Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters, of then-President Donald Trump, opens new tab, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.
“Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases,” said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. “Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages.”
Stone, a veteran Republican operative and self-described “dirty trickster”, and Jones, founder of a conspiracy-driven radio show and webcast, are both allies of Trump and had been involved in pro-Trump events in Washington on Jan. 5, the day before the riot.
FBI investigators did find that cells of protesters, including followers of the far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups, had aimed to break into the Capitol. But they found no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside, the sources said.